........................................................................
SpankyThis came up in this thread:
https://www.campidiot.com/viewtopic.php?id=1480479
The poster in #23 says:
wrote:
Nope. Many states have a +/- 4 year rule.
You dont bust a guy when he turns 18 for fuqing the girl he has legally been fuqing for years.
I said in post #24:
Sockpuppet wrote:
Link to any state allowing a 15yo to fuq an 11yo?
The poster in #29 says:
wrote:
Thats legal in every state if both are juveniles.
I said in post #31:
Sockpuppet wrote:
No.
---
I wanted to come back to this, because the person I was replying to is continually advocating for the purported legality of sex with people <=14. I find it worrisome to be honest.
The 15/11 example I gave was based on what I, loosely, knew about the law. The situation is illegal, on its face, in 49 of 50 states. It is also illegal in the 50th state (Nebraska) under certain circumstances.
I looked at two states in depth: Illinois and Minnesota.
In Illinois, consensual, in the ordinary sense, sex between any two people under 17 is illegal. So, a 16/16 high school consensual relationship that involves sexual intercourse is illegal. Now, of course, this will almost never be prosecuted. A 15/11 scenario is similarly illegal, but much more likely to be prosecuted. In addition, in the 15/11 case the crime could be elevated by aggravating factors such as coercion.
Minnesota works much more how I thought it worked generally. 16/16 is legal. 15/11 is a felony. When a child is under 14 then it is a felony, on its face, for anybody 36+ months older to have sex with that child. This is 30 years max in prison.
The person who thinks this is legal in all 50 states has a severe mental illness.
........................................................................
Is there a defacto Muzzie loophole?
........................................................................
What the fuq is going on in this thread?
........................................................................
wrote:
Is there a defacto Muzzie loophole?
Only if the people involved are father/daughter/wife
Then, it is acceptable
........................................................................
wrote:
What the fuq is going on in this thread?

........................................................................
Spankywrote:
![]()
SOUNDS HOT!!
\

........................................................................
SamplesBoiAnd only negroes do it. 
RACIST!
........................................................................
SpankySamplesBoi wrote:
And only baggers do it.
RACIST!
FIFY
........................................................................
SpankySamplesBoi wrote:
And only males do it.
RACIST!
FIFY variant
........................................................................
wrote:
Only if the people involved are [s]father/daughter/wife[/s] goats
Then, it is acceptable
........................................................................

........................................................................
WHAT IF THE 15YO IS THE OLDER BROTHER OF HIS 11YO SISTER?
\

........................................................................
I was 30, she was 12.
\
befuddledbiden.png
........................................................................
Trump has no minimum
........................................................................
ITS DEFACTO LEGAL FOR A WHITE CONSERVATIVE MAN TO FUQ ANY THING HE WANTS WITH TOTAL AND ABSOLUTE IMPUNITY.
\
........................................................................
Tom LeykisSpanky is really enjoying his subject about underage sex. Another compulsion driving him.
........................................................................
What about 13 and 11? What's the statute of limitations? 
........................................................................
wrote:
What about 13 and 11? What's the statute of limitations?
In muslim families, the statute of limitations is either until the stoning, beheading, or honor killing.
........................................................................
Assclown Mini TacosReminder: Frantically googling the details of ages of consent in various states is a really good way to end up on a list you probably don't want to be on.
........................................................................
Any jurisdiction where the age of consent is a day over 16 is an oppressive regime.
........................................................................
What is the age of consent for handjobs?
\
........................................................................
wrote:
Any jurisdiction where the age of consent is a day over 16 is an oppressive regime.
California
........................................................................
Assclown Mini Tacos wrote:
Reminder: Frantically googling the details of ages of consent in various states is a really good way to end up on a list you probably don't want to be on.

........................................................................
........................................................................
Sockpuppetwrote:
https://theonion.com/man-knows-unsettling-amount-about-nationwide-age-of-con-1819565878/

........................................................................
Previous | First | 1 | 2 | Last | Next