........................................................................
It's about time.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/ftc-noncom … forceable.
Federal regulators on Tuesday enacted a nationwide ban on new noncompete agreements, which keep millions of Americans — from minimum-wage earners to CEOs — from changing jobs within their industries.
The Federal Trade Commission on Tuesday afternoon voted 3-to-2 approve the new rule, which will ban noncompetes for all workers when the regulations take effect in 120 days. For senior executives, existing noncompetes can remain in force. For all other employees, existing noncompetes are not enforceable.
The FTC heard from thousands of people who said they had been harmed by noncompetes, illustrating how the agreements are "robbing people of their economic liberty," FTC Chair Lina Khan said.
The FTC commissioners voted along party lines, with its two Republicans arguing the agency lacked the jurisdiction to enact the rule and that such moves should be made in Congress.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/ftc-noncom … forceable.
........................................................................
anon user #3Enter the Bagger SCOTUS...
........................................................................
anon user #3"The FTC commissioners voted along party lines, with its two Republicans arguing the agency lacked the jurisdiction to enact the rule and that such moves should be made in Congress."
Yep. Bagz will ruin it for everyone....again. Sigh.
........................................................................
anon user #3 wrote:
"The FTC commissioners voted along party lines, with its two Republicans arguing the agency lacked the jurisdiction to enact the rule and that such moves should be made in Congress."
Yep. Bagz will ruin it for everyone....again. Sigh.
So do you think FTC congress or the supreme court should decide these things?
........................................................................
anon user #3 wrote:
"The FTC commissioners voted along party lines, with its two Republicans arguing the agency lacked the jurisdiction to enact the rule and that such moves should be made in Congress."
Yep. Bagz will ruin it for everyone....again. Sigh.
\
aucbgayggles.png
the agency lacks the jurisdiction to enact the rule - such moves should be made in Congress
Unsurprising that a criminally anti-American hater of rule of law like you would spew such psychotic filth. You are vermin.
........................................................................
Congress is too busy laundering 'war money' and insider trading to bother writing a law about this trivial shyt.
........................................................................
Tom LeykisSomething has to be done here. In California, where I ran businesses, noncompete agreements were there to prevent you from taking a list of clients, what they paid and what their schedule of protection was and either starting a competing business against your former employer, or starting a criminal enterprise. The state of California has voided that restriction. Not good.
Now I live in Idaho, where it is legal and common to require you to sign a "noncompete" agreement in order to get a job in animal care. If you quit that job, the noncompete can bar you from ANY job involving animal care in the state for howevr many years. That is abuse and is the kind of thing that needs to stop.
........................................................................
Original_Lonely_GuyNon compete agreements have been banned in California for years. Good riddence.
........................................................................
Phillip_McCavityThis helps trevs.
........................................................................
Sockpuppetanon user #3 wrote:
Enter the Bagger SCOTUS...
Yep.
........................................................................
ArtieTubbsSockpuppet wrote:
Yep.
Spankie has never had a job senior enough to require a non compete
........................................................................
anon user #3 wrote:
Enter the Bagger SCOTUS...
\
anonspazer.gif
When is the case?
Oh, you're just a moron looking for reasons to be OUTRAGED!
........................................................................
Sockpuppet wrote:
Yep.
Has there already been a lower court ruling and failed appeal?
........................................................................
Libs are so full of hate and rage that even a win for them feels like a loss.
What a bunch of losers.
........................................................................
anon user #3 wrote:
Enter the Bagger SCOTUS...
Did Uber tell you that you can't work for Lyft?
........................................................................
Previous | First | 1 | Last | Next