> The inchoate rage of the American right: where does it come from?

VP_Spiro_T_Cheney wrote:

It must be that whyte and the libruls and al Quada, there the ones that ruint everything!!!!
\

We can smell your desperation, landwhale.

codepinkfatlady.jpg

ImperialExecutive wrote:

We created millions of jobs by borrowing trillions of dollars!
     \

Sorry.  We had to get rid of that "jobs created" and "jobs saved" stuff, as it was too easy to disprove.  The correct term this week is "lives touched".

http://www.thefoxnation.com/business/20 … d-stimulus

Every time a report on the stimulus bill is released, one can almost hear the sound of ?Yakety Sax? playing in the background and the president?s team running around in frantic disarray.

It isn?t simply the absurdity of a recent Government Accountability Report (GAO), finding that each job ?created? by the stimulus bill costs an average of $194,213.  It?s the fundamental shell game that the administration is playing with the public regarding the numbers, a game that can only be interpreted one of two ways ? either the administration itself is inept in their reporting, or they assume the American people are too inept to catch on.

In fact, the jobs reporting has been such a muddled mess, that even liberal media stalwart, MSNBC, couldn?t keep track of their stories earlier in the year.  On January 13th, they ran two stimulus related stories, one which touted the White House claim that the stimulus had saved two million jobs, and another which explained why calculating such a number is impossible.

Now however, the GAO report shows that the phrase ?jobs created? or ?jobs saved? is no longer the term of choice.  They have decided to go with ? wait for it ? ?lives touched.?

Essentially, we?ve now transitioned from the aforementioned terminology, on to ?jobs funded?, and eventually landed on something reminiscent of an after school special, ?lives touched?.

wrote:

Sorry.  We had to get rid of that "jobs created" and "jobs saved" stuff, as it was too easy to disprove.  The correct term this week is "lives touched".

http://www.thefoxnation.com/business/20 … d-stimulus

Every time a report on the stimulus bill is released, one can almost hear the sound of ?Yakety Sax? playing in the background and the president?s team running around in frantic disarray.

It isn?t simply the absurdity of a recent Government Accountability Report (GAO), finding that each job ?created? by the stimulus bill costs an average of $194,213.  It?s the fundamental shell game that the administration is playing with the public regarding the numbers, a game that can only be interpreted one of two ways ? either the administration itself is inept in their reporting, or they assume the American people are too inept to catch on.

In fact, the jobs reporting has been such a muddled mess, that even liberal media stalwart, MSNBC, couldn?t keep track of their stories earlier in the year.  On January 13th, they ran two stimulus related stories, one which touted the White House claim that the stimulus had saved two million jobs, and another which explained why calculating such a number is impossible.

Now however, the GAO report shows that the phrase ?jobs created? or ?jobs saved? is no longer the term of choice.  They have decided to go with ? wait for it ? ?lives touched.?

Essentially, we?ve now transitioned from the aforementioned terminology, on to ?jobs funded?, and eventually landed on something reminiscent of an after school special, ?lives touched?.

Lives touched?  WTF?

Ho Chi Minh wrote:

codepinkfatlady.jpg

No one will ever decode that pink.