> Well, suddenly the Baggers are in favor of "gun control" again.

Sockpuppet wrote:

Let me ask you this.

Is the race of the offender an important criminal stat?

Still refusing to answer his very simple question about your absurd 'analysis' garbage:

"why did you make up a metric that gives a "rate" that decreases as the target population size grows?

I've already pointed out that expressing rates using data from disjoint data sets (in this case, attackers and victims) is highly problematic and prone to giving you results that are utterly meaningless - so if you are going to do this you need some supportable and clearly articulated rationale for doing so. Especially in cases like this when it's an adjustment that clearly skews the numbers in a specific direction.

So the question remains - why did you do this? Especially since this isn't some tangential issue - it's absolutely central to the headline results you originally presented."

Why are you so afraid of answering that?

Don't bother, I already know, as does everyone here looking at your racist bullshyt; you're a dishonest hypocrite scumbag fraud. Like all libfilth vermin. No exceptions.