> IT'S HARD TO TAKE TRUMPERS SERIOUSLY!!! HOW CAN THEY STAY SO STUPID FOR SO LONG???

forget to change monikers?

wrote:

forget to change monikers?

It is just what "they" do

Pretend to be 10 different people who all agree.

It is pretty easy to see through if you look

Tom Leykis wrote:

OK, It looks like I was right yesterday:  You ARE looking for a gay date.   Good luck and be quiet.

DO THE VOICES IN YOUR HEAD TELL YOU THAT YOU'RE NOT MENTALLY ILL FOR SUPPORTING THAT PEACH COLOURED CRIMINAL QUNT???

TRUST ME!!!

YOU ARE!!!

wrote:

Democrats have no belief system.  They gave that shyt up 10 years ago in order to focus more on hating Trump.

TO HATE THAT HE'S A TRAITOR???

TO HATE THAT HE'S A PEADOPHILE???

TO HATE THAT HE'S A RAPIST???

TO HATE THAT HE'S A CROOK???

TO HATE THAT HE'S A AN IDIOT???

TO HATE THAT HE'S A AN ALL AROUND SCUMBAG???

wrote:

Wow! Sounds like you really got him this time.

What's the  democrat view on immigration? On Minimum wage? On Iran? On Anything...

Oh right, nobody knows... they gave up all that shyt to focus on hating Trump.

A BIPARTISAN BORDER SECURITY PACKAGE WAS NEGOTIATED UNDER JOE BIDEN AND BROUGHT TO A VOTE IN THE U.S. SENATE IN 2024 DURING THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION, AND MOST REPUBLICANS VOTED AGAINST IT. [1, 2]

KEY DETAILS OF THE BILL
•    LEGISLATION: FORMALLY KNOWN AS THE SENATE BORDER COMPROMISE AND INTRODUCED AS S. 4361 (THE BORDER ACT OF 2024), THE PACKAGE WAS NEGOTIATED BY A BIPARTISAN GROUP INCLUDING SENATOR JAMES LANKFORD (R-OK), SENATOR CHRIS MURPHY (D-CT), AND INDEPENDENT SENATOR KYRSTEN SINEMA (I-AZ). [1, 2, 3]

•    PROVISIONS: THE $20 BILLION PROPOSAL AIMED TO OVERHAUL ASYLUM STANDARDS, END THE PRACTICE OF RELEASING MIGRANTS INTO U.S. COMMUNITIES WHILE AWAITING HEARINGS, AND GRANT THE PRESIDENT EMERGENCY EXECUTIVE AUTHORITY TO SHUT DOWN THE SOUTHERN BORDER WHEN DAILY CROSSINGS CROSSED HIGH THRESHOLDS. [1, 2, 3]

WHAT HAPPENED IN CONGRESS
•    INITIAL COLLAPSE (FEBRUARY 2024): AFTER FACING HEAVY CRITICISM FROM DONALD TRUMP AND HARD-LINE CONSERVATIVE LAWMAKERS WHO PREFERRED TOUGHER HOUSE-PASSED MEASURES (LIKE H.R. 2), MOST SENATE REPUBLICANS BACKED AWAY FROM THE DEAL THEY HAD PREVIOUSLY HELPED NEGOTIATE. [1, 2, 3]

•    FAILED SENATE VOTES: THE BILL FAILED TO CLEAR PROCEDURAL HURDLES IN THE U.S. SENATE—FALLING SHORT OF THE 60 VOTES NEEDED WITH A 49–50 VOTE IN FEBRUARY AND A 43–50 VOTE IN MAY 2024. [1, 2]

•    PERSPECTIVES: DEMOCRATS AND SUPPORTERS OF THE BILL ARGUED THAT REPUBLICANS KILLED A STRICT, LONG-SOUGHT ENFORCEMENT DEAL FOR POLITICAL REASONS DURING AN ELECTION YEAR, WHILE OPPOSING REPUBLICANS AND SOME CO-AUTHORS CHARACTERIZED SUBSEQUENT STANDALONE VOTES AS POLITICAL POSITIONING OR INSUFFICIENT COMPARED TO HARSHER RESTRICTIONS. [1, 2, 3, 4]

wrote:

Facts are hard as fuq!
    \